ArticleTrials2025
CRYSTALLBrain: crystalloid fluid choice and neurological outcome in patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage-a study protocol for a multi-centre randomised double-blind clinical trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04043598 (Crystalloid Fluid Choice and Neurological Outcome in Patients After Subarachnoid Haemorrhage - a Multi-center Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Crystalloid Fluid Choice and Neurological Outcome in Patients After Subarachnoid Haemorrhage - a Multi-center Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVasospasms are common in patients presenting with non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and are the main contributor to long-term disability or death in these patients. The key immediate management of vasospasms is the improvement of brain perfusion by the administration of intravenous fluid and vasopressors if needed. Yet, there is no clear recommendation regarding the choice of fluid in this particular patient population. Data suggests a survival benefit using normal saline in patients with TBI; however, its impact on outcomes in patients with SAH is lacking. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate whether the use of normal saline reduces clinically relevant vasospasms compared to Ringer's lactate in patients with SAH.
methodsPatients presenting with non-traumatic SAH will be randomised 1:1 to normal saline or Ringer's lactate group. Blinded study fluid will be used exclusively for resuscitation and maintenance until ICU/IMC discharge or a maximum of 14 days, whichever occurs first. Management of vasospasms and general management of the SAH patient will be according to the clinic standard of care. Primary endpoint is the occurrence of clinically relevant vasospasms. Key secondary outcomes include mortality, severity and treatment of vasospasms, and neurological outcomes at 90 days. DISCUSSION: The proposed randomised controlled trial offers a safe, non-invasive way to gain insights about crystalloid fluid choice in SAH patients, with potential to improve outcomes in this critically ill patient group. This study could establish a new gold standard in fluid therapy for neuro-critical care.
trial registrationThe trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (date of registration 18 June 2021) and on the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal, SNCTP000004575.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.