ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Conservative treatment of patellofemoral pain: effectiveness of strength exercises compared to other treatments. a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy for patellofemoral pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of foot core training combined with hip and knee strengthening on patients with patellofemoral pain: a randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Trial
- Translational rehabilitation strategies for canine medial patellar luxation: insights from human patellofemoral pain syndrome.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of strengthening exercise compared to other conservative treatment methods to reduce pain and improve functional abilities for patellofemoral pain.
methodsMEDLINE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase were the databases consulted from inception until June 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included with patients diagnosed with patellofemoral pain, adolescents over 16 years of age and adults up to 44 years of age, athletes and non-athletes, regardless of gender, and in which pain recorded at 4-6 weeks or 8-12 weeks follow-up was the primary outcome. Functional evaluation scales of the knee as the Anterior Knee Pain Scale, with a follow-up of 8-12 weeks or 6 months were secondary outcome.
resultsDatabase search yielded a total of 1,654 papers and 12 papers were included. The meta-analysis on the change in pre- and post-treatment pain at 4-6 weeks and 8-12 weeks showed an average reduction of -1.44 (CI. -2.20; -0.67) for 601 patients included and -0.8 (CI -1.23; -0.37) in favour of the intervention group with exercises for 719 patients. In subgroup analysis performed for woman population, the mean difference in pain reduction was -2.81 (CI -4.39; -1.23). At 8-12 weeks, standardized mean difference for functional outcomes, in pre-post treatment variation between the two groups was 0.08 (CI -0.07; 0.24) in favour of the intervention for 685 patients included. A very low and low level of certainty of the evidence was recorded based on Risk of Bias analysis and GRADE method.
conclusionA positive effect in the use of muscle strengthening strategies in the treatment of patellofemoral pain was highlighted, albeit with a low level of certainty of the results. Women benefit most from treatment with strengthening exercises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.