ArticleBMC nursing2025
The impact of clinical nurse leadership models on the quality of care at the unit level: a systematic review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The practical impact of postgraduate leadership education on Registered Nurses' practice: a narrative inquiry.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2026Article
- Impact of a leadership training programme on nursing leadership, self-efficacy and competency among ICU clinical nurses: a quasi-experimental study in China.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Nursing Practice Environments and Professional and Care-Related Outcomes in Portuguese Emergency Services: A Descriptive Study of 2018 and 2022.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- The Nexus of Practice Environment, Management, and Nursing Competency: A Cross-Sectional Study of Community Nursing Services in Saudi Arabia's Northern Border Region.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective leadership is one of the most critical factors in achieving successful outcomes for an organization. Therefore, modern healthcare needs effective clinical nurse leadership to improve the quality of care. This study aimed to analyse the effectiveness of clinical nurse leadership models and the impact that these models have on the quality of care at the unit level.
methodsInitial searches were performed from January 2012 to January 2025 on the platforms PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCO, Scopus and Science Direct. A total of 2822 articles were obtained, their abstracts and titles were read. The full texts of 84 articles were read and critically evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The screening of titles and abstracts, and subsequently full-text publications, was performed blinded by two author teams using the inclusion/exclusion criteria.
resultsA total of five studies satisfied the eligibility criteria and were included. Current evidence suggests associations between positive clinical nurse leadership, increased openness in communication, lower medical errors, higher quality of care and patient satisfaction and safety.
conclusionThere is a positive association between clinical nurse leadership style and quality of care. However, future investigation of various clinical leadership models is required to test the best mechanisms to implement clinical leadership in nursing practice. Findings provide encouraging support for the conceptualization of clinical nurse leadership models at the unit level for nurse leaders. The organizational policies regarding the competencies of clinical nursing leaders needs to be improved to increase the quality of care at the unit level. Features of clinical nurse leadership models that have a positive impact on quality of care, should be taught in practice and academic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.