ArticleBMC public health2025
Efforts to increase uptake of cervical cancer screening in the absence of a national programme in Ghana: a qualitative study of stakeholders' experience.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer in women globally. Ghana, West of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), is reported to have a high crude cervical cancer incidence of 18.3 per 100,000 women. Cervical cancer screening (CCS) uptake in Ghana has been reported to be between 0.8% and 12%. Ghana, like many developing countries worldwide, are yet to experience the benefits of organised screening. This study sought to understand the direct and indirect actions of key stakeholders in Ghana that contributed to the promotion of CCS in a country without a population-based screening programme. METHODOLOGY: Primary qualitative data was obtained from 16 stakeholders using in-depth interviews via ZOOM virtual platform. Stakeholders were those involved in the delivery of CCS activities and were identified through purposive and snowball sampling. Transcripts were manually created from verbatim accounts of interviews. Data was managed in NVivo software and analysed using an inductive approach to qualitative data evaluation. Emerging themes were drawn out by thematic analysis.
resultsKey findings identified were intra-health facility-based factors that promoted CCS including cost control measures, screening methods, opportunistic CCS, promotion linked activities and innovative health practices. Additionally, sponsored mass CCS, staff training, policy advocacy and proactive health promotion and education were extra-health facility-based factors that stakeholders felt led to CCS uptake at the facility and community levels. Stakeholders played an active role in promoting CCS using health education through health promotional measures such as mass media advertisements, electronic fliers, creating social media content especially during the Cervical Cancer Awareness Month (CCAM) in January. CCS costs were often reduced during in January because of negotiations with non-governmental organisations and corporate bodies, ultimately resulting in sponsored mass cervical cancer screening which improved cervical cancer screening uptake.
conclusionIn the absence of a national cervical cancer screening programme, the study found out that it is the contributions of committed stakeholders that may be ensuring the continued existence of CCS services in Ghana. The goodwill that is shown by society during the CCAM in January should be harnessed to broaden the scope and reach of cervical screening activities beyond January.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.