ArticleBMC oral health2025
No-shows among children and adolescents in public oral health service: a retrospective register-based study from Finland.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergency dental visits and no-shows among children and adolescents in public oral health service in Finland: a retrospective evaluation.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study is to assess dental no-shows or missed scheduled dental appointments among children and adolescents in public oral health services in Helsinki, Finland, where under 18-year-olds receive subsidized oral health care.
methodsThis retrospective register-based study focused under 18-year-olds in Helsinki who had dental no-shows, which was defined as any failure to arrive for a scheduled appointment without notifying, in the public oral health services from 2006 to 2020. The study utilized retrospectively collected data from the City of Helsinki’s electronic patient health information register systems, Effica (2006–2017) and Lifecare (2018–2020), which were in use during the respective periods. In the context of this study, children refer age group 0–9 years and adolescents 10–17 years.
resultsA total of 2,513,376 appointments were found from patient register; 92.6% (n = 2,326,878) were actualized visits and 7.4% (n = 186,498) no-shows. Dental no-shows among children and adolescents showed decreasing trend from 9.9% to 5.8% between 2006 and 2020 except of slight increase in year 2019. Of all dental no-shows, 5.2% were registered among children and 8.6% among adolescents. Boys had more frequently no-shows than girls (p < 0.01). Of the study population, 5% had 21.8% of all no-shows.
conclusionsThe 15-year trend analysis showed a reduction in yearly dental no-show prevalence among children and adolescents, in general. However, there is a positive correlation between age and the frequency of no-shows. There was a strong polarization of the no-show phenomenon, only 5% of the children and adolescents accounting more than one fifth of all missed appointments. This polarized group needs to be characterized, so that potential underlying causes can be studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.