Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107902›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2025

Ethics of nursing in the digital age: perceptions and challenges among Korean nursing students.

Hwa-Mi Yang, Young-Eun Jang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hwa-Mi YangDepartment of Nursing, Daejin University, Pocheon-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8116-2188
Young-Eun JangDepartment of Nursing, Sahmyook Health University, 82, Mangu-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02500, Republic of Korea. 0120dream@naver.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5171-4906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advancement of digital technologies has brought transformative changes across the healthcare sector, and nursing is no exception. However, existing research has largely overlooked the ethical challenges nursing students face in real-world clinical settings, including dilemmas arising from the integration of artificial intelligence, patient privacy, and digital communication. This study explored nursing students' perceptions and challenges regarding nursing ethics in the digital age, focusing on the ethical dilemmas they face and their strategies for resolution.

methodsWe conducted two focus group interviews with 13 nursing students from two universities in Seoul, South Korea. Discussions centered on their experiences with ethical conflicts in digital healthcare environments.

resultsNursing students frequently experienced ethical tensions between utilizing digital information and protecting patient privacy, including concerns about photographing EMR screens and using patient data without explicit consent. Many reported confusion in ethical decision-making due to unclear institutional guidelines and insufficient practical guidance. A notable gap existed between theoretical ethics education and its application in digital contexts. Introducing AI in clinical settings further complicates ethical reasoning, raising questions about trust, accountability, and verification of AI-driven decisions. Students also highlighted ethical risks in digital communication, such as improper use of hospital messaging systems and social media, which threaten professionalism and confidentiality. These findings emphasize students' strong demand for enhanced digital ethics education through case-based learning, simulations, and experiential training.

conclusionsNursing students stressed the need for practical ethics education that bridges the gap between theory and real-world application. This study underscores the importance of mandatory, practice-focused training linked to clinical environments, reinforced patient privacy protections, and ongoing education addressing ethical issues posed by emerging technologies like AI. To develop ethically competent nurses, digital ethics education must adopt a comprehensive, practice-oriented framework grounded in the realities of modern healthcare.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDigital TechnologyEthics, NursingStudents, NursingAdultArtificial IntelligenceConfidentialityDecision MakingFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePrivacyQualitative ResearchRepublic of KoreaYoung AdultDigital healthEthicsNursingQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41107902
PMCPMC12533348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.