ArticleBMC nursing2025
Development of ECMO training program for ICU nurses knowledge gain and self-efficacy outcomes assessment: quasi-experimental evaluation : ECMO training & nursing.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIM AND
objectivesTo develop an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) training program for intensive care unit (ICU) nurses and assessing the impact of the training on the knowledge and self-efficacy outcomes of the ICU nurses. BACKROUND: The number of patients receiving ECMO support is increasing in Turkiye. However, ICU nurses providing care to ECMO patients lack of structured ECMO training programs.
designA quasi-experimental study including a single group pretest and posttest.
methodsThe study was conducted with 50 ICU nurses working in a public hospital in Ankara, Türkiye. ECMO training program was developed based on the ADDIE (A = Analyze, D = Design, D = Develop, I = Implement, E = Evaluation) model. Data were collected through with a “Knowledge Test’, ‘Self-Efficacy Perception Scale Regarding the Effectiveness of ICU Nurses in the Care of Patients with ECMO (ECMO- SEPS), ‘Simulation checklist’ and ‘Evaluation form for the effectiveness of the training programme’.
resultsIn the pretest measurement of the nurses, the mean total score of the knowledge test was 12.0 ± 3.60, while it increased to 21.4 ± 3.57 after the training. In a retest one month after the training, the mean was found to be 20.2 ± 4.92 (p < 0.05). The effect size in the knowledge test (d = 2.62) confirms that the educational content was successful in transferring knowledge. It was found that the posttest and retest sub-dimension scores of the ECMO- SEPS increased in all three sub-dimensions compared to the pretest scores, and this increase was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The training significantly increased nurses’ self-efficacy (η²=0.702) at a statistically significant and practically important level. The strongest effect was in the cognitive domain (η²=0.736). In the psychomotor domain (η²=0.592), it significantly improved application skills. Affective (η²=0.576): Education had a significant impact on motivation and self-confidence. After the training, an average of 15.0 ± 4.04 of the 22 items in the simulation checklist were fully implemented by the nurses.
conclusionIn this study η² values and statistical significance (p < 0.001) prove that ECMO training program is clinically effective and sustainable for ICU nurses knowledge and self-efficacy. The lack of a control group in the study and the fact that all participants were from a single hospital limits the generalisability of the findings. Therefore, it is recommended that future studies implement the ECMO training programme nationwide and be randomised controlled trials. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.