ArticleBMC medical education2025
Validating simulated patient programmes in Obstetrics and Gynaecology education: a mixed-method study on training effectiveness and stakeholder perceptions in the GCC.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSimulated patients (SPs) are widely used in medical education to help students acquire clinical skills in a safe and realistic setting. In fields such as obstetrics and gynaecology (OB-GYN), where real-patient interactions can be limited due to cultural sensitivities-especially in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries-SPs play a crucial role in medical education. This study aimed to validate the training of SPs for assessing OB-GYN history-taking skills and explore the perceptions of stakeholders - including faculty, students, leadership and SPs - regarding the implementation, challenges and potential improvements of the SP programme.
methodsA mixed-methods research design was employed in this study. During the quantitative phase, training of SPs using a structured OB-GYN history-taking module was conducted, followed by an evaluation of their performance by expert raters. The inter-rater reliability was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa and Cronbach's alpha. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with students, SPs, faculty trainers and academic leaders. Thematic analysis was performed to identify common themes and divergent viewpoints.
resultsQuantitative results showed moderate-to-high inter-rater reliability, indicating consistent and effective SP performance post-training. Qualitative findings revealed that stakeholders perceived that the usage of SPs results in the enhancement of student engagement, realism and communication skills. However, challenges such as cultural sensitivities, limited SP diversity and logistical constraints were highlighted. Stakeholders emphasised the need for culturally contextualised training, periodic feedback loops and institutional support.
conclusionsThe study confirms that structured training can effectively prepare simulated patients for OB-GYN education in GCC settings. By integrating stakeholder feedback, this study provides valuable insights for refining SP programmes and addressing region-specific challenges. A more culturally aware and well-supported SP programme can boost student confidence and improve learning outcomes in sensitive clinical areas like OB-GYN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.