ArticleBMC medical education2025
International accreditation in Iranian universities of medical sciences: a qualitative analysis of challenges and solutions.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInternational accreditation of universities is a comprehensive evaluation process conducted by reputable external bodies to ensure adherence to quality and effectiveness standards in higher education institutions. This study aimed to identify the challenges and strategic solutions related to the international accreditation of Iranian universities of medical sciences (IUMS).
methodsThis qualitative study was conducted in 2023 across IUMS. Data were collected through purposive semistructured interviews with 36 individuals, including administrators, faculty members, and experts from various university departments under the supervision of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME). The interviews continued until data saturation was achieved. The data were analyzed using the conventional content analysis approach proposed by Graneheim and Lundman.
resultsA total of 52 challenges were identified, the most critical of which were cultural barriers, weak implementation processes, and inappropriate organizational structures. In parallel, 57 solutions were classified into seven categories, including training and education, infrastructure development, communication enhancement, policymaking and planning, self-assessment, improvement of standards and indicators, and process optimization.
conclusionsThis study identified major barriers to international accreditation in IUMS and proposed practical solutions. Progress requires joint action: universities should strengthen training, infrastructure, documentation, and internal quality assurance, while accrediting bodies and national authorities must provide supportive regulations, adequate resources, and context-sensitive standards aligned with global frameworks. Coordinated efforts at both levels are essential for enhancing accreditation readiness, improving quality, and increasing global competitiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.