ArticleBMC surgery2025
Obstruction of the pharyngeal airway space after correction surgery in the cervical spine for dropped head syndrome.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative dysphagia has been reported to occur as the result of narrowing of the pharyngeal airway space (PAS) due to a change in the alignment of the cervical spine. This study aimed to investigate potential risk factors for postoperative PAS obstruction following corrective surgery for dropped head syndrome (DHS) by analyzing clinical and radiographic parameters.
methodsThis retrospective design included 42 patients (7 men, 35 women; mean age, 71.5 years) who underwent corrective surgery for DHS. The following measurements were obtained: narrowest PAS (nPAS), cervical vertebra 2 (C2)–7 angle, occipito (O)–C1 angle, C1–2 angle, and swallowing line (S-line). The correlations between the postoperative nPAS and clinical and radiographic factors were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the specific factors for the occurrence of postoperative dysphagia. ROC analysis was also used to determine the cut-off values. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
resultsThe mean preoperative nPAS was 15.0 ± 4.1 mm, which significantly decreased to 11.4 ± 3.6 mm postoperatively. The mean preoperative O-C1 angle was 7.8 ± 7.1°, which decreased to −7.2 ± 6.6° postoperatively. The mean pre- and postoperative C1–2 angles were 38.9 ± 5.8° and 34.8 ± 5.8°, respectively. Among this cohort, the mean nPAS of patients with S-line(-) was significantly smaller (8.5 ± 2.5 mm) than that of those with S-line(+) (11.7 ± 3.6 mm). Postoperative nPAS was correlated with O–C1 angle (r = 0.55, P < 0.015). Forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression showed that C0-1 angle (odds ratio (OR: 5.774) was the most impactable factor for the occurrence of postoperative dysphagia. ROC analysis revealed that the cut-off value for the occurrence of postoperative dysphagia was nPAS of 10.78 mm.
conclusionThe reduction of the O–C1 angle as a reciprocal change after the surgical correction of mid/lower cervical spine kyphosis for DHS may be a key factor in the occurrence of postoperative dysphagia due to airway obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.