ArticleBMC urology2025
Predictors of bleeding requiring transfusion following partial nephrectomy: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database.
Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Partial nephrectomy (PN) has been established as the standard treatment for T1 kidney tumors, and postoperative hemorrhage has been reported as a potentially life-threatening complication.PurposeTo estimate the risk of bleeding requiring blood transfusion using patient characteristics in order to risk-stratify patients preoperatively and identify patients at high risk of bleeding following PN. We also aim to quantify the effect of this bleeding complication on postoperative morbidity and mortality.Materials and methodsThe demographics, associated co-morbidities, and some pre-operative variables, operation characteristics and baseline laboratory values were examined in 23,257 patients undergoing PN in the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality of Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset from 2005 to 2017. We divided our cohort into two groups based on the requirement of a blood transfusion post-operation. Multivariable logistic regression was done to evaluate pre-operative variables associated with post-operative transfusion. The secondary outcome was analyzed, using Chi-square and student t-test, to compare post-operative morbidities and mortality between groups.ResultsOf the 23,257 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy (PN), 1,287 (5.5%) experienced postoperative hemorrhage requiring transfusion. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between the hemorrhage and non-hemorrhage groups with respect to age, race, body mass index, comorbidities, ASA class, surgical approach, year of operation, and baseline laboratory values. However, on multivariate analysis, only older age, open surgical approach, presence of a bleeding disorder, having received preoperative transfusions, higher preoperative blood urea nitrogen (BUN), lower serum albumin, lower hematocrit, and prolonged partial thromboplastin time (PTT) were independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative hemorrhage. Furthermore, patients who experienced hemorrhage had significantly higher rates of other postoperative complications compared to those who did not.ConclusionsAccurate estimation of bleeding risk is critical for decision making and informed consent prior to PN, especially given the demonstrated impact on morbidity and mortality of this complication. A risk calculator is a helpful tool to help minimize the occurrence of this complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.