ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Prediction of suicidal ideation and depression in the general population with subthreshold insomnia using machine learning models.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInsomnia is a significant independent risk factor for depression and suicidality. However, these conditions often go undetected, particularly in individuals presenting with sleep complaints. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for the indirect screening of suicidal ideation (SI) and depression and to specifically evaluate their performance in a population reporting at least subthreshold insomnia.
methodsData were obtained from a Slovenian nationwide community sample (N = 2,989) via an online questionnaire. Logistic regression models were developed to predict SI (measured by SIDAS) and moderate-to-severe depression (measured by DASS-21) via indirect predictors, including socio-demographics, life satisfaction, behavioral changes, and 14 coping strategies from the Brief COPE inventory. The model performance was tested on a validation sample, which was stratified into groups with (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] score ≥ 8; n = 917) and without (ISI < 8; n = 819) insomnia symptoms.
resultsThe models demonstrated strong and consistent predictive performance across both groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the SI model was 0.78 in the insomnia group and 0.80 in the non-insomnia group. For the depression model, the AUROCs were 0.79 and 0.82, respectively. The minimal difference in performance indicates that the models are robust and equally effective regardless of the presence of insomnia.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate that ML models using indirect questions can effectively screen for both suicidality and depression simultaneously. The models' robust performance in individuals with insomnia highlights their potential as feasible, ethical, and efficient tools for early detection. Given that sleep complaints are a common reason for seeking healthcare, this approach offers a critical opportunity for timely intervention in a high-risk population, potentially reducing preventable morbidity and mortality associated with suicide and depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.