Trial reportBMC medical education2025
Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team teaching method on breastfeeding knowledge of nursing students in China: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpecial breastfeeding training is rare in China and contradicts clinical expectations for students.Multidisciplinary team (MDT) approaches have been extensively advocated in nursing education. However, the incorporation of MDT education to enhance students' knowledge of breastfeeding remains insufficient and constrained.
objectiveTo examine the change in knowledge of nursing students in China following a clinical MDT education intervention on breastfeeding.
methodsThis was a 2-arm randomized controlled trial. This study examined differences in pre- and posttest breastfeeding knowledge scores of experimental and control groups. The intervention group adopted the MDT teaching method, the control group received a routine training model. A comparative analysis of subindicators, which consisted of satisfaction levels among students, teachers, and administrators was conducted.
resultsThe breastfeeding knowledge and satisfaction of the intervention group exceeded that of the control group. There were differences in enhancement scores between the intervention and control groups.
conclusionThe MDT educational intervention notably bolstered nursing students' breastfeeding knowledge.It is advisable to heighten awareness of educational initiatives and establish a robust foundation for future breastfeeding promotion endeavors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.