Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107790›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Machine learning for sudden cardiac death prediction among older adults using community-based electronic health records.

Yue Li, Zihan Mei, Guolei Sun, Zhengkun Liu, Ji Li, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Haojun Fan, Chunxia Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yue Li *School of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Zihan Mei *School of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Guolei SunTianjin Jinnan Hospital (Jinnan Hospital, Tianjin University), Tianjin, China.
Zhengkun LiuSchool of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Ji LiSchool of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Marcus Eng Hock OngDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Haojun FanSchool of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. haojunfan86@163.com.
Chunxia CaoSchool of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. caochunxia@tju.edu.cn.

Funding

Key Laboratory of Medical Rescue Key Technology and Equipment, Ministry of Emergency Management YJBKFKT202418the National Key R&D Program of China 2023YFF1204104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) models have shown good performance in predicting cardiovascular disease risk. However, the usefulness of ML models has yet to be fully elucidated for sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk using long-term follow-up electronic health records (EHRs). This study aimed to develop and validate ML models for SCD risk prediction among community-dwelling older adults using 6-year primary-care EHRs data.

methodsData were obtained from the Jinnan Study, an EHR-based cohort of older adults. A total of 30,535 individuals aged ≥ 65 years from three towns were included. The primary outcome was SCD. Candidate predictors included gender, age, heart rate, body mass index (BMI), waist, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), physical activity, current smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), QTc prolongation and ST wave abnormality. We employed the data of one town as the training dataset (16,049 individuals), and the data of other 2 towns as the test dataset (14,486 individuals). The two feature selection strategies used were Cox proportional hazards model (Cox model) and random survival forests model (RSF model). Cox model, Fine-gray model, RSF model, lasso Cox regression model and boosted Cox regression model were fitted, optimized through 5-fold cross-validation using the training dataset, and externally validated on the test dataset. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed.

resultsWith a median follow-up of 5.67 years, 224 SCD events occurred. RSF outperformed other models, with a C-index of 0.820 in the training set and 0.757 in the test dataset (P < 0.001). Calibration plots indicated that most SCD events occurred in individuals within the highest deciles of predicted risk. Summary plots using the "survex" package were generated to enhance interpretability of the RSF model.

conclusionML models can significantly enhance the prediction of SCD risk using community-based EHRs. Our proposed risk model may enable the identification of high-risk individuals among older adults, facilitating targeted interventions and personalized care strategies. Future research should focus on integrating this model into routine primary care workflows and evaluating its effectiveness in real-world settings.

Indexed as

Death, Sudden, CardiacElectronic Health RecordsMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsCommunityElderlyElectronic health recordsMachine learningRisk predictionSudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID41107790
PMCPMC12534963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.