ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Navigating critical time: a qualitative exploration of the experiences of patients and companions in myocardial infarction management.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyocardial infarction (MI) is an emergency situation, perceived as a unique experience by both the patient and their companion. This study aims to explore the experiences of patients and their companions throughout all stages of myocardial infarction management.
methodA descriptive qualitative design was employed in this study. Nineteen participants, including 13 patients with a confirmed MI diagnosis and 6 companions, were selected through purposive sampling from a hospital in northeastern Iran. In-person, semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the conventional qualitative content analysis approach.
resultsThe study revealed key categories in participants' experiences before and after their MI. These included "overlooking health risks" due to neglect and misunderstanding of health, and "harmful hesitation" characterized by delays in seeking medical help, often due to denial and self-treatment. Participants also delayed in "understanding the definitive risk", which led to worsened symptoms. "Missed golden time due to system-level delays" highlighted diagnostic and treatment delays, while a greater "realization of the importance of adherence" to a healthy lifestyle was reported post-MI. The role of companions was also pivotal in influencing patient management and treatment.
conclusionDelays in recognizing MI symptoms were influenced by lack of health awareness, hesitation, and healthcare inefficiencies, leading to worsened outcomes. Improving public health education, awareness of MI symptoms, and healthcare responsiveness can reduce these delays. Additionally, the support of companions plays a critical role in ensuring timely medical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.