ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Direct construction of sparse suffix arrays with Libsais.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPattern matching is a fundamental challenge in bioinformatics, especially in the fields of genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics. Efficient indexing structures, such as suffix arrays, are critical for searching large datasets. A sparse suffix array (SSA) retains only suffixes at every k-th position in the text, where k is the sparseness factor. While sparse suffix arrays offer significant memory savings compared to full suffix arrays, they typically still require the construction of a full suffix array prior to a sampling step, resulting in substantial memory overhead during the construction phase.
resultsWe present an alternative method to directly construct the sparse suffix array using a simple, yet powerful text encoding. This encoding reduces the input text length by grouping characters, thereby enabling direct SSA construction by extending the widely used Libsais library. This approach bypasses the need to construct a full suffix array, reducing memory usage and construction time by 50 to 75% when building a sparse suffix array with sparseness factor 3 or 4 for various nucleotide and amino acid datasets. Depending on the alphabet size, similar gains can be achieved for sparseness factors up to 8. For higher sparseness factors, comparable performance improvements can be obtained by constructing the SSA using a suitable divisor of the desired sparseness factor, followed by a subsampling step. The method is particularly effective for applications with small alphabets, such as a nucleotide or amino acid alphabet. An open-source implementation of this method is available on GitHub, enabling easy adoption for large-scale bioinformatics applications.
conclusionsWe introduce an efficient method for the construction of sparse suffix arrays for large datasets. Central to this approach is the introduction of a simple text transformation, which then serves as input to Libsais. This method reduces the length of both the input text and the resulting suffix array by a factor of k, which improves execution time and memory usage significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.