Observational studyBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025
Patients' peri-operative experiences with non-pharmacologic pain care techniques: a secondary qualitative analysis of the NOHARM trial.
Observational study in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05166356 (Describing the Determinants and Effects of Variation in the Adoption and Use of the NOHARM Pain Management Intervention Among Diverse Surgical Practices), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Describing the Determinants and Effects of Variation in the Adoption and Use of the NOHARM Pain Management Intervention Among Diverse Surgical Practices
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeri-operative pain management guidelines recommend multimodal strategies, but education on non-pharmacological pain care (NPPC) is lacking. The present study explored patients' experiences participating in the Healing After Surgery (HAS) initiative as part of a pragmatic clinical trial, designed to provide patients with peri-operative education and support for using NPPC.
methodsWe sought to interview two patients from each of the 31 surgical practices participating in the trial. Interviews were semi-structured, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We used a rapid analytic approach to summarize interview transcripts. Summaries were uploaded to NVivo and two researchers independently reviewed queries and produced analytic memos with key themes organized according to the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability's seven constructs.
resultsWe analyzed interview transcripts for 71 patients. Findings revealed that patients (1) generally liked the HAS initiative (affective attitude), (2) it aligned with patients' beliefs about wellness techniques and concerns about opioids (ethicality), and (3) many patients had experience using NPPC (self-efficacy). However, (4) care team education and provision of NPPC was inconsistent (intervention coherence), (5) patients varied on their thoughts about the effectiveness of NPPC and the role of NPPC and medication (perceived effectiveness), (6) some patients found resources repetitive and encountered logistical challenges engaging with resources or using NPPC (burden), and (7) patients cited completing tasks ahead of surgery and competing demands post-operatively (e.g., caring for a spouse or young children) as barriers (opportunity costs). An additional theme, the invisible and individualistic nature of pain, also emerged.
conclusionsPeri-operative initiatives that educate patients about NPPC may be well-received and remind patients of "wellness techniques" and alert them to their role in pain management. Familiarity with NPPC may contribute to patients' self-efficacy using these techniques. However, some patients may require additional support to feel comfortable using NPPC in a post-operative context. Emphasizing the care team's role of directing patients to existing educational recourse or interactive supportive resources may be a low burden way of providing this support. Adding a health coach role to the intervention may also be an option for providing extra support without increasing care teams' workload.
trial registrationThis study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05166356, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05166356?term=%20NCT05166356&rank=1 Patient enrollment began on 3/01/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.