Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107758›Full record

Observational studyBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025

Patients' peri-operative experiences with non-pharmacologic pain care techniques: a secondary qualitative analysis of the NOHARM trial.

Sarah A Minteer, Christy M Audeh, Cindy Tofthagen, Kathy E Sheffield, Susanne M Cutshall, Jon C Tilburt, Andrea L Cheville

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05166356 (Describing the Determinants and Effects of Variation in the Adoption and Use of the NOHARM Pain Management Intervention Among Diverse Surgical Practices), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05166356 completednot on this map

Describing the Determinants and Effects of Variation in the Adoption and Use of the NOHARM Pain Management Intervention Among Diverse Surgical Practices

TypeobservationalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2022 to 2024Enrolled372ConditionsSurgical Procedure, Unspecified
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah A MinteerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. minteer.sarah@mayo.edu.
Christy M AudehBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Cindy TofthagenDepartment of Nursing Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Kathy E SheffieldDepartment of Nursing Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Susanne M CutshallDepartment of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jon C Tilburt *Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Andrea L Cheville *Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory-Coordinating Center (U24)U24AT009676 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLEY H CURTIS, Adrian Hernandez · 2017 to 2026
$21.5M
HEAL Collaboratory Resource Coordinating Center (PRISM) (U24): Bioethics SupplementU24AT010961 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, LESLEY H, HERNANDEZ, ADRIAN · 2019 to 2021
$6.4M
Non-pharmacological Options in postoperative Hospital-based And Rehabilitation pain Management (NOHARM) pragmatic clinical trialUH3AG067593 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CHEVILLE, ANDREA LYNNE, TILBURT, JON C · 2020 to 2023
$6.0M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009676NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT010961NIA NIH HHS UH3 AG067593NIH HEAL Initiative UH3 AG67593-04PRISM Resource Coordinating Center U24AT010961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeri-operative pain management guidelines recommend multimodal strategies, but education on non-pharmacological pain care (NPPC) is lacking. The present study explored patients' experiences participating in the Healing After Surgery (HAS) initiative as part of a pragmatic clinical trial, designed to provide patients with peri-operative education and support for using NPPC.

methodsWe sought to interview two patients from each of the 31 surgical practices participating in the trial. Interviews were semi-structured, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We used a rapid analytic approach to summarize interview transcripts. Summaries were uploaded to NVivo and two researchers independently reviewed queries and produced analytic memos with key themes organized according to the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability's seven constructs.

resultsWe analyzed interview transcripts for 71 patients. Findings revealed that patients (1) generally liked the HAS initiative (affective attitude), (2) it aligned with patients' beliefs about wellness techniques and concerns about opioids (ethicality), and (3) many patients had experience using NPPC (self-efficacy). However, (4) care team education and provision of NPPC was inconsistent (intervention coherence), (5) patients varied on their thoughts about the effectiveness of NPPC and the role of NPPC and medication (perceived effectiveness), (6) some patients found resources repetitive and encountered logistical challenges engaging with resources or using NPPC (burden), and (7) patients cited completing tasks ahead of surgery and competing demands post-operatively (e.g., caring for a spouse or young children) as barriers (opportunity costs). An additional theme, the invisible and individualistic nature of pain, also emerged.

conclusionsPeri-operative initiatives that educate patients about NPPC may be well-received and remind patients of "wellness techniques" and alert them to their role in pain management. Familiarity with NPPC may contribute to patients' self-efficacy using these techniques. However, some patients may require additional support to feel comfortable using NPPC in a post-operative context. Emphasizing the care team's role of directing patients to existing educational recourse or interactive supportive resources may be a low burden way of providing this support. Adding a health coach role to the intervention may also be an option for providing extra support without increasing care teams' workload.

trial registrationThis study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05166356, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05166356?term=%20NCT05166356&rank=1 Patient enrollment began on 3/01/2022.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementPostoperative PainAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicQualitative ResearchNon-pharmacological pain carePatient perspectivePost-operative pain

Identifiers

PMID41107758
PMCPMC12535021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.