Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107752›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Comprehensive evaluation of NAT+/HBsAg- blood donors: confirmation strategies, serial testing outcomes, and S gene mutations associated with occult HBV infection.

Rongsong Du, Wenbo Gao, Zhongping Li, Haojian Liang, Fenfang Liao, Junmou Xie, Feifeng Li, Zhiting Wan, Shijie Li, Ru Xu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Effectiveness of donor selection in a blood bank].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rongsong Du *Institute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Wenbo Gao *Institute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Zhongping LiInstitute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Haojian LiangInstitute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Fenfang LiaoInstitute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Junmou XieInstitute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Feifeng LiInstitute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Zhiting WanInstitute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Shijie LiInstitute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Ru XuInstitute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Yongshui FuGuangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Yongmei NieInstitute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China.
Hao WangInstitute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China. wanghao_med@foxmail.com.
Huaqin LiangInstitute of Blood Transfusion and Hematology, Guangzhou Blood Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 31 Lu yuan Rd, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, 510095, China. lianghuaqin11@163.com.

Funding

Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2024A03J0150Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2024A03J0447the Key Medical Disciplines and Specialties Program of Guangzhou 2025-2027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundS gene mutations may lead to undetectable HBsAg, contributing to occult HBV infection (OBI). Nucleic acid testing (NAT) has been widely implemented to reduce transfusion-transmitted OBI. However, distinguishing between false positives and true OBI among NAT+/HBsAg- donors remains challenging, as these individuals frequently exhibit inconsistent or fluctuating test results. This study aims to improve infection status confirmation and donor management by analyzing detection patterns and investigating S gene mutations.

methodsBlood donors were detected for HBV using individual-NAT and HBsAg enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Routine discriminatory test (dHBV), additional three repeated dHBV (3-repeated dHBV), and serological assays were conducted to confirm the infection status of NAT+/HBsAg- donors. Serial NAT results were analyzed to assess temporal fluctuations. S gene mutations related with OBI were identified through molecular characterization and sequencing analysis.

resultsA total of 336,537 blood donors were detected, and 556 (0.16%) NAT+/HBsAg- cases were identified. Among 297 donors undergoing confirmation, 112 (37.71%) were confirmed by routine dHBV, 152 (51.18%) by 3-repeated dHBV, and 43 (14.48%) by multiple serial NATs. In total, 187 donors (62.96%, 187/297) were confirmed HBV-infected, significantly higher than routine dHBV alone (P < 0.01). Among the 187 confirmed HBV-infected donors, only 59 (31.55%) were positive in all four dHBV tests, while 128 (68.45%) showed missed detections, suggesting extremely low viral loads. In serial NAT testing, 83 (73.45%, 83/113) of donors confirmed by dHBV showed no further NAT-positive results, and an average of 5.6 tests was needed to detect one extra positive case. Molecular analysis revealed that OBI samples had more mutations in both the major hydrophilic region (MHR) and non-MHR compared to HBsAg + donors (P < 0.05), with a significantly higher prevalence of the E2G mutation.

conclusionsOBI is a major contributor to inconsistent NAT results. Comprehensive measures, especially repeated testing, are recommended to improve confirmation rates and reduce the risk of re-entry of potentially infectious donors. Additionally, further molecular research on S gene mutations is essential for elucidating OBI mechanisms and enhancing assay sensitivity.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsHepatitis BHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis B virusMutationNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesAdultDNA, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultDNA, ViralHepatitis B Surface AntigensBlood donorDonor managementNucleic acid testingOccult hepatitis B virus infectionRe-entry strategyS gene mutation

Identifiers

PMID41107752
PMCPMC12534964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.