SynthesisThe journal of headache and pain2025
Migraine and risk of all-cause mortality and specific cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in migraine-specific medication consumption: a multinational analysis of 73 countries based on IQVIA-MIDAS database, 2015 to 2024.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Lifetime Probability of Developing Migraine: A Novel Epidemiological Perspective Based on Global Burden of Disease Data.Pain research & management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMigraine is a common neurological disorder associated with various comorbidities, however its impact on mortality remains controversial. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the associations between migraine and the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and suicide mortality.
methodsA comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to July 1, 2025, to identify eligible cohort studies assessing mortality outcomes in individuals with migraine. Random- or fixed-effects models were used to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
resultsEighteen cohort studies, including 7,928,722 participants and 49,105 all-cause deaths, were included. No significant association was found between any migraine (AM) and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.80–1.09, I² = 94.7%), CVD mortality (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.80–1.18, I² = 80.6%), or suicide mortality (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.98–1.26, I² = 15.5%). Considerable heterogeneity was observed across the studies for all-cause and CVD mortality. Subgroup analyses revealed a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in studies based on physician-diagnosed migraines and in those with a follow-up duration of less than 12 years. Meta-regression analyses identified the migraine diagnosis method and mean follow-up duration as potential sources of heterogeneity for all-cause mortality. However, the sex-stratified subgroup analysis demonstrated a higher CVD mortality risk with low heterogeneity in women with migraine (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.08–1.34, I² = 0.0%), particularly in those with migraine with aura (MA) (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.03–1.60, I² = 23.8%). Meta-regression analyses did not identify the sources of heterogeneity in the CVD mortality studies.
conclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis found no evidence linking AM with all-cause or cause-specific mortality. However, significant heterogeneity across studies and indications of an elevated CVD mortality risk in women with AM, particularly MA, render these findings inconclusive. Further research is required to elucidate this relationship and its underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.