Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107696›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026

Using a metaphor of baskets and copper pots to identify "what work, whose work" in truth, rights, responsibilities, and reconciliation in public health.

Danièle Behn Smith, Jessica Chenery, Naomi Dove, Kate Jongbloed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danièle Behn Smith *BC Office of the Provincial Health Officer, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Jessica Chenery *Chee Mamuk, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Naomi Dove *Chee Mamuk, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kate Jongbloed *BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada. kate.jongbloed@bccdc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9903-5630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ten years since the Truth & Reconciliation Commission Report, Canadian institutions-including public health systems-have yet to advance the Calls to Action in a sustained, transformative way. As public health leaders in the territory now known as British Columbia, we witness tension as colleagues grapple with, "What is the work of Truth & Reconciliation? Whose work is it?". Too often, truth and reconciliation is delegated to a small Indigenous team (or, individual) dangling, isolated off the side of an organizational chart. We offer a metaphor highlighting two interconnected, but distinct areas of work to advance truth and reconciliation in public health. One is the work of reclaiming and resurgence of languages, culture, medicines, and connection to territory, undertaken by and for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Peoples. The other is eradicating Indigenous-specific racism and white supremacy to advance cultural safety. It is not up to Indigenous people to eradicate racism; as it is constructed, maintained, and perpetuated by settlers, settlers are those with the power to eradicate it. As we move towards the anniversary of the TRC, we share a metaphor that helps our settler colleagues understand and claim their responsibility in truth, rights, and reconciliation in public health.

Indexed as

Human RightsIndigenous CanadiansMetaphorPublic HealthSocial ResponsibilityBritish ColumbiaHumansRacismIndigenous-specific racismPublic healthReconciliationSettler colonialismWhite supremacy

Identifiers

PMID41107696
PMCPMC13337963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.