ReviewJournal of neurology2025
Efficacy and safety of ublituximab for relapsing multiple sclerosis patients: current evidence and expert opinion.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune reconstitution and tolerance-inducing therapies as promising therapeutic approaches in multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Optimizing Infusion Center Efficiency in Multiple Sclerosis: A Nursing Multicenter Survey on Organizational Impact of Ublituximab.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ublituximab, a newly launched anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, represents a substantial advancement in the treatment landscape for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Its unique glycoengineered design enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, enabling rapid and effective B-cell depletion. Phase III randomized controlled trials ULTIMATE I and II confirmed superior efficacy of ublituximab over teriflunomide, achieving substantial reductions in annualized relapse rates, near-complete suppression of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions and new/enlarging T2-hyperintense white matter lesions, as well as higher rates of no evidence of disease activity 3. Safety data indicate that ublituximab is generally well tolerated, with mild, manageable infusion-related reactions as the most common adverse event. Its streamlined infusion protocol, requiring maintenance doses administered in just 1 h twice a year, provides a practical solution to the clinical and logistical challenges of MS management. Its rapid B-cell depletion, high efficacy, and convenient twice-yearly short infusion regimen make it particularly suitable for treatment-naïve patients with high disease activity who may benefit from early and robust disease control as well as for those who have experienced suboptimal responses, poor tolerability, or safety concerns with prior disease-modifying therapies. Although ublituximab shows great promise and five-year data are already available, further research is required to fully explore its potential in limiting disability progression and neurodegeneration, as well as to confirm its long-term safety. Real-world evidence, extended follow-ups, and comprehensive biomarker assessment specific to MS-related pathology will be essential to confirm its efficacy and optimize RMS patients' management. This review synthesizes discussions from two meetings of Italian Neurologists held in 2024 and 2025, focusing on efficacy and safety data of ublituximab, and providing a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of its current and future role in RMS treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.