ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026
Impact of financial deprivation in first-episode psychosis: a prospective 4-year follow-up study.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effect of monetary versus point-based rewards on effort-cost decision making in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.Schizophrenia research · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSocioeconomic disadvantage can exacerbate psychosis outcomes, yet the long-term impact of financial deprivation remains underexplored. This study examined how financial deprivation at first-episode psychosis affects clinical, functional, and neurocognitive outcomes over four years.
methodsParticipants were 240 adults (26-55 years) from the Jockey Club Early Psychosis project in Hong Kong, China. Financial deprivation was defined as household income < 50% of the median for household size. Regression analyses assessed the predictive value of baseline financial deprivation on four-year outcomes, controlling for sociodemographic and premorbid confounders. Age-subgroup analyses explored differential effects across developmental periods (< 33, 33-42, > 42 years).
resultsAt baseline, 121 participants (51.7%) were financially deprived, characterized by lower education, more siblings, foreign-born status, and residence in public housing. Baseline financial deprivation predicted worse four-year clinical, functional, and quality of life outcomes four years later. Financial hardship did not appear to predict neurocognitive outcomes at follow-up. Age-subgroup analyses indicated the strongest and most consistent effects in participants > 42 years, with minimal to modest effects in younger subgroups.
conclusionsFinancial deprivation during early psychosis represents a high-risk subgroup, particularly in later adulthood, with persistent symptomatic and functional impairments. Early identification and age-sensitive interventions, such as vocational support, social benefits assistance, and programs promoting social integration and independent living, are essential. Policy measures targeting socioeconomic disadvantage may mitigate long-term impacts on illness trajectory and recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.