ReviewJournal of neurology2025
JC virus PCR assay reporting for PML: promises, perils, and pitfalls.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy - a diagnostic guide for the clinical neurologist.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most devastating central nervous system infections, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), is caused by the JC virus (JCV). In immunosuppressed patients, PML is a well-recognized complication recognized by clinicians across specialties, such as neurology, internal medicine, oncology, and rheumatology. It can be encountered in patients receiving hematopoietic or solid-organ transplants, cytotoxic chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, or long-term immunosuppressive therapies. In neurological settings, those treated with natalizumab, rituximab, ocrelizumab, fingolimod, or dimethyl fumarate can be at risk of developing PML. The gold standard for diagnosing PML is the detection of JCV DNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by PCR in the context of compatible clinical and MRI findings. In cases where JCV PCR assay results are negative or inconclusive, the diagnosis may rely on brain biopsy or clinical/radiographic findings. However, an under-recognized vulnerability exists in the way JCV PCR results are reported-'positive or negative'. The results omit critical assay metrics, such as the limit of quantitation (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) data. Hence, a false sense of diagnostic certainty prevails, leading to missed or delayed diagnoses of early stage PML, where viral loads are often low. Unless clinicians are aware of this possibility, a diagnosis of PML can be delayed or missed. This systemic reporting failure is a diagnostic shortcoming with consequences not just for patient care but is a potential legal minefield. Mandatory inclusion of LOQ and LOD across JCV PCR reports in CSF will provide diagnostic transparency and provide critical information that clinicians need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41107574What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.