ArticleGeroScience2026
Religious group differences in non-communicable disease risk factors in India: A cross-sectional study of adults aged 45 and older.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study highlights the underexplored differences in the prevalence and distribution of noncommunicable disease (NCD) risk factors among Hindu, Muslim, Christian, and Sikh Indian adults aged 45 and older. Using nationally representative data from 54,601 participants in the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (2017-2018), we investigated nine NCD risk factors by sex: hypertension, abdominal adiposity, diabetes, tobacco use, excessive alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, poor sleep hygiene, household air pollution exposure, and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. The multilevel regression analyses we conducted yielded novel findings (reference: Hindu men and women). Muslim men and women had a higher risk of high abdominal adiposity (adjusted odds ratio (aORmen) = 1.33 [ 95% confidence interval: 1.17-1.52]; aORwomen = 1.60 [1.42-1.81]), diabetes (aORmen = 1.24 [1.08-1.42]; aORwomen = 1.40 [1.24-1.59]), and physical inactivity (aORmen = 1.20 [1.06-1.36]; aORwomen = 1.49 [1.31-1.70]). Additionally, Muslim women were more likely to be hypertensive (aOR = 1.20 [1.09, 1.32]) and have elevated CRP levels (aOR = 1.23 [1.07-1.42]). Sikh men and women had increased odds of abdominal adiposity (aORmen = 2.01 [1.52-2.66]; aORwomen = 2.11 [1.45-3.08]). Sikh men were also more likely to be hypertensive (aOR = 1.31 [1.03-1.68]). Both Christian men and women showed lower odds of poor sleep hygiene (aORmen = 0.72 [0.59, 0.89]; aORwomen = 0.71 [0.61, 0.84]), with Christian men also being less likely to have diabetes (aOR = 0.67 [0.56-0.81]). Hindu adults reported higher exposure to household air pollution. Public health stakeholders in India need to be informed about these disparities to guide prevention efforts, and the factors driving these disparities require further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.