ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2025
[Initial care and stabilization of ACHD patients : Teamwork improves outcomes].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital heart defects encompass a wide spectrum of varying anatomies and physiologies. Residuals after surgical or interventional treatment during childhood significantly shape the clinical course, as do multiple organ involvement and the development of degenerative diseases. As adults, many patients with congenital heart defects are no longer treated within specialized care structures, which is associated with a worsening prognosis and an increased frequency of emergency situations. Without appropriate expertise, emergencies in patients with complex congenital heart defects are challenging to assess. Arrhythmias and heart failure are the most common emergency scenarios in adults with congenital heart defects. Atrial tachycardias, particularly in the context of a Fontan circulation or a systemic right ventricle, should be treated promptly. Since the overall risk of sudden cardiac death is increased, syncope must always be thoroughly investigated. Depending on the specific anatomy and physiology, different therapeutic strategies must be employed for heart failure. In Eisenmenger syndrome, chronic cyanosis with reactive polycythemia and multiple organ involvement is the primary concern. Pregnancy and the peripartum period may precipitate decompensation of previously compensated conditions in patients with congenital heart disease. The ABCDE approach (Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure) can generally be followed. However, without knowledge of the patient's medical history, treatment errors with potentially severe consequences can easily occur. By adding the letter F to the ABCDE scheme, the importance of the patient's Former medical history and additional information (Further information) in this vulnerable patient group is emphasized. A multidisciplinary approach and close coordination with a specialized adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) center are critical for improving the prognosis in acute situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41107561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.