ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Myelography-still up to date?]
Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelography is used to visualize the spinal cord and its nerve roots either after intrathecal (IT) injection of contrast media into the spinal subarachnoid space (SAS) or noninvasively using heavily T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MRI) sequences. An IT injection can be image-guided (e.g., x‑ray fluoroscopy-guided or computed tomography (CT)-guided). Before the introduction of CT and MR imaging, fluoroscopic myelography was the predominant technique and the gold standard for neuroradiological examination of the contents of the spinal SAS. MR-myelography has not completely replaced fluoroscopic or CT-myelographic examination, and surgeons occasionally request supplemental myelography to resolve unclear MRI findings. Furthermore, the growing interest of neuroradiologists in accurately diagnosing and treating cerebrospinal fluid leaks has created a renewed need for this imaging modality. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is a cause of secondary headache resulting from the leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the spine. The typical presentation is an orthostatic headache that worsens in the upright position; however, over time, the orthostatic quality may be absent, and other headache types may occur. When conservative treatment or epidural blood patching are not effective, it may be necessary to localize the site of a spinal CSF leak to provide surgical treatment. Dynamic CT-myelography (CTM), digital subtraction-myelography (DSM), or dynamic fluoroscopic myelography are necessary to visualize the CSF leak.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41107530What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.