ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Timing and survival benefits of cytoreduction in patients with recurrent leiomyosarcoma.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLeiomyosarcoma is characterized by its aggressive behavior, poor prognosis, resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs, and high recurrence rate. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors affecting the effectiveness of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) on overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent leiomyosarcoma (LMS).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted at Başkent University Ankara Hospital from 2007 to 2016, involving 59 patients with uterine LMS who underwent surgery. We assessed demographic and clinical variables, disease recurrence intervals, and treatment outcomes.
resultsThe median age of the patients was 50.0 (23-78) years, and the median follow-up time was 25.0 (2-87) months. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were 15.0 and 37.0 months, respectively. Disease recurrence occurred in 44 patients (74.6%). After recurrence, 34 (77.3%) patients underwent CRS and chemotherapy (CT), while 10 (22.7%) patients received only CT. The median OS was 19.0 months for patients who underwent CRS and received CT and 15.0 months for those who received only CT (p = 0.132). Notably, OS was significantly longer for patients whose recurrence occurred after 6 months compared to those with early recurrence (19 versus 8 months, p = 0.049).
conclusionCRS provided a modest survival benefit for patients with recurrent LMS, although statistical significance was not achieved. The results of this study indicate that the timing of recurrence plays a crucial role in survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.