ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy utilization in male patients with early breast cancer: results from a large German real-world claims data analysis.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMale breast cancer (BC) is a rare entity and represents a significant clinical challenge due to its late diagnosis and resulting poorer prognosis compared to female BC. As shown by prior studies, approximately 99% of male BC patients are hormone receptor-positive (HR +). This study aimed to evaluate the utilization and impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in male early BC patients using a large German real-world claims dataset. PATIENTS AND
methodsData were collected from a major German statutory health insurance provider (AOK Baden-Wuerttemberg) covering the period between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Male patients diagnosed with early BC who underwent breast surgery were included. ET use was determined by prescription records. The impact of ET on overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariable (log-rank) and multivariable (cox regression) analysis.
resultsAmong 128 male early BC patients, 16% (n = 21) did not utilize adjuvant ET. On univariable analysis, ET was significantly associated with 5-year OS (74% with ET vs. 37% without ET; p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed ET use (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.69, p = 0.004) having a positive effect on OS, whereas age (HR: 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.09) and comorbidities (HR: 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.34, p = 0.007) were identified as negative predictive factors for OS.
conclusionA significant proportion of male patients with early BC does not use ET. However, the use of ET plays a key role in improving survival outcomes for male patients with early BC. Efforts to improve the use of ET, including patient education and management of side effects, are essential to optimize treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.