Trial reportArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Comparison of estradiol hemihydrate 10 µg vaginal tablets versus estradiol hemihydrate 10 µg vaginal gel in postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy: a randomized crossover study.
Trial report in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis randomized crossover study evaluated the 12 week efficacy of a 10 µg estradiol hemihydrate vaginal tablet versus a vaginal gel (available at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand) in postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy. Secondary endpoints included the most bothersome symptom, vaginal health index (VHI), vaginal pH, female sexual function index, serum estradiol, endometrial thickness, ease of use, comfort, and satisfaction.
methodsNinety participants were randomized to receive either the 10 µg estradiol tablet or the gel daily for 2 weeks, followed by twice-weekly application for 10 weeks. Afterward, they switched to the alternate treatment for another 12 weeks using the same dosing regimen. Assessments of VHI, pH, vaginal maturation value (VMV), female sexual function index, endometrial thickness, and estradiol levels were conducted at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks.
resultsEighty-five participants completed the study. At 12 weeks (intention-to-treat analysis), the gel significantly increased VMV compared with the tablet (60.16 ± 12.00 vs 51.62 ± 23.77; P = 0.035; 95% CI 0.54 to 16.46), although the 95% CI included the noninferiority margin of 15. Per-protocol analysis showed no significant difference between groups. VHI improved, and pH decreased more markedly with the gel at 12 weeks. By 24 weeks, there were no significant between-group differences in VMV, pH, or most bothersome symptom. Acceptability was high for both treatments, although 55.3% of participants indicated a preference for continued gel use.
conclusionsNoninferiority of the 10 µg estradiol hemihydrate tablet relative to the gel could not be established. However, both treatments exhibited clinical benefits and high patient satisfaction, providing valuable insights for therapeutic decision-making in postmenopausal vaginal atrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.