Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107495›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Comprehensive deep learning-assisted multi-condition analysis of knee MRI studies improves resident radiologist performance.

Roman Vuskov, Alexander Hermans, Martin Pixberg, Jonas Müller-Hübenthal, Andreas Brauksiepe, Eric Corban, Malin Cubukcu, Julia Nowak, Aleksandar Kargaliev, Marc von der Stück and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Roman VuskovLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany. rvuskov@ukaachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5022-9120
Alexander HermansLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2127-0782
Martin PixbergRadiologic Practice Cologne Triangle, Cologne, Germany.
Jonas Müller-HübenthalRadiologic Practice Cologne Triangle, Cologne, Germany.
Andreas BrauksiepeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Eric CorbanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Malin CubukcuDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Julia NowakDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Aleksandar KargalievDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Marc von der StückLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2801-3679
Robert SiepmannLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Christiane KuhlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8696-2363
Daniel TruhnLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9605-0728
Sven NebelungLab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5267-9962

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung DECIPHER-M - 01KD2420BBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung SWAG - 01KD2215BBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Transform Liver - 031L0312CDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 1700/7-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 2136/3-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 2136/7-1European Union Research and Innovation Programme ODELIA - GA 101057091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDeveloping a deep-learning model for automated multi-tissue, multi-condition knee MRI analysis and assessing its clinical potential. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective dual-center study included 3121 MRI studies from 3018 adults, who underwent routine knee MRI examinations at a radiologic practice (2012-2019). Twenty-three conditions across cartilage, menisci, bone marrow, ligaments, and other soft tissues were manually labeled. A 3D slice transformer network was trained for binary classification and evaluated in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity using a five-fold cross-validation and an external test set of 448 MRI studies (429 adults) from a university hospital (2022-2023). To assess differences in diagnostic performance, two inexperienced and two experienced radiology residents read 50 external test studies with and without model assistance. Paired t-tests were used for statistical analysis.

resultsAveraged over cross-validation tests, the model's AUC was at least 0.85 for 8 conditions and at least 0.75 for 18 conditions. Generalization on the external test set was robust, with a mean absolute AUC difference of 0.05 ± 0.03 per condition. Model assistance improved accuracy and sensitivity for inexperienced residents, increased inter-reader agreement for both groups, and increased sensitivity and shortened reading times by 10% (p = 0.045) for experienced residents. Specificity decreased slightly when conditions with low model performance (AUC < 0.75) were included.

conclusionOur deep-learning model performed well across diverse knee conditions and effectively assisted radiology residents. Future work should focus on more fine-grained predictions for subtle or rare conditions to enable comprehensive joint assessment in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: Question Increasing MRI utilization adds pressure on radiologists, necessitating comprehensive AI models for image analysis to manage this growing demand efficiently. Findings Our AI model enhanced diagnostic performance and efficiency of resident radiologists when reading knee MRI studies, demonstrating robust results across diverse conditions and two datasets. Clinical relevance Model assistance increases the sensitivity of radiologists, helping to identify pathologies that were overlooked without AI assistance. Reduced reading times suggest potential alleviation of radiologists' workload.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleMiddle AgedRadiologistsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityDeep learningKneeMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID41107495
PMCPMC13035746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.