ArticleScientific reports2025
Bio-inspired neutrosophic-enzyme intelligence framework for pediatric dental disease detection using multi-modal clinical data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric oral diseases affect over 60% of children globally, yet current diagnostic approaches lack precision and speed necessary for early intervention. This study developed a novel bio-inspired neutrosophic-enzyme intelligence framework integrating biological principles with uncertainty quantification for enhanced pediatric dental diagnostics. We validated the framework across 18,432 pediatric patients aged 3-17 years from six international centers using multi-modal data, including clinical examinations, radiographic imaging, genetic biomarkers, and behavioral assessments. The framework incorporates neutrosophic deep learning for uncertainty modeling, enzyme-inspired feature extraction mimicking salivary enzyme dynamics, axolotl-regenerative healing prediction, and genetic-immunological optimization. Comprehensive validation employed stratified cross-validation, leave-one-center-out testing, and 18-month longitudinal tracking with mixed-effects statistical analysis. The framework achieved 97.3% diagnostic accuracy (95% CI: 95.8-98.2%), 94.7% sensitivity for incipient caries detection, and 96.2% specificity, significantly outperforming conventional methods (80.2% accuracy, p < 0.001) and state-of-art deep learning (89.4% accuracy, p < 0.001). Clinical efficiency improved with 37.5% diagnostic time reduction and 58.1% patient throughput increase. Cross-population validation showed consistent performance (89.7-93.8% accuracy) across ethnic groups with no demographic bias (p > 0.05). Economic analysis demonstrated 34.5% cost reduction with $12,450 per quality-adjusted life year and 8.7-month return on investment. The framework provides explicit uncertainty quantification enabling risk-stratified clinical decisions while maintaining robust safety profiles with zero serious adverse events. All algorithmic implementations and supplementary statistical validation reports are publicly provided to ensure transparency and reproducibility. This bio-inspired approach establishes new benchmarks for AI-assisted pediatric healthcare, demonstrating superior diagnostic performance, clinical efficiency, and global scalability for addressing pediatric oral health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.