Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107478›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A nap before retrieval reduces false identifications in target absent lineups.

Matías Bonilla, Cristian García Bauza, Cecilia Forcato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matías BonillaLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Iguazú 341 (1437) Capital Federal Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cristian García BauzaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cecilia ForcatoLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Iguazú 341 (1437) Capital Federal Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. cforcato@itba.edu.ar.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación 02666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eyewitness misidentifications are a major cause of wrongful convictions. While most research has focused on the role of sleep in memory encoding and consolidation, recent findings suggest that non-REM sleep may also enhance retrieval processes by restoring executive and monitoring functions. Here, we investigated whether a short nap before retrieval could improve performance in forensic memory tasks. Participants watched an aversive video of a robbery and, after 24 h, either took a 60-minute nap (Sleep group) or stayed awake (Wake group) before completing a series of memory tasks, including face recognition (target-present and target-absent lineups), free recall, context recognition, and temporal order. A nap prior to retrieval selectively reduced false identifications in target-absent lineups, increasing correct rejections without affecting performance in target-present trials. Temporal order memory also improved in the Sleep group, whereas no significant differences were observed in free recall or context recognition. Confidence-accuracy calibration was stronger in the Sleep group, particularly when the perpetrator was absent. These findings suggest that a brief nap prior to memory retrieval may improve the accuracy of eyewitness decisions by enhancing metacognitive monitoring and temporal discrimination, offering a simple, non-invasive intervention to reduce errors in forensic settings.

Indexed as

Mental RecallRecognition, PsychologySleepAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41107478
PMCPMC12534383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.