ArticleScientific reports2025
Lactate/albumin ratio predicts mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a retrospective machine learning study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between lactate-to-albumin ratio and in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Synergistic impact of immuno-nutritional and hypoxia-metabolic disturbances on post-stroke epilepsy: a "Two-Hit" prediction model and web-based risk calculator.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Severe COVID-19 often progresses to critical illness, requiring accurate prognostic biomarkers. Lactate-to-albumin ratio (LAR) has been proposed as a novel indicator to estimate the likelihood of death. Using data from the MIMIC database, this retrospective study assessed lactate-to-albumin ratio (LAR) effectiveness in forecasting outcomes among severely ill COVID-19 patients. Patients were grouped into four quartiles based on their lactate-to-albumin ratio (LAR) values. Analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method revealed a clear difference in survival outcomes among the groups, with individuals with higher levels of LAR indicating a higher observed mortality rate. The RCS analysis identified a distinct nonlinear link between LAR values and overall 28-day death rates (P < 0.001), which retained statistical significance after covariate adjustment (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression verified that LAR independently correlates with 28-day death risk (HR = 1.309, 95% CI: 1.113-1.540). Subgroup analyses consistently indicated increased mortality risks in Q4 across most strata. Both the Boruta and LASSO algorithms identified LAR as a key determinant of 28-day mortality. Among the machine learning models evaluated, the Random Survival Forest (RSF) model demonstrated strong overall predictive performance for 14-day (AUC: 0.948) and 28-day (AUC: 0.887) mortality prediction in both the training and test datasets. The prediction model incorporating LAR achieved outstanding results across multiple algorithmic methods, serving as an effective and simple clinical tool that enables risk stratification and guides therapeutic decision-making through the integration of multidimensional parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.