ArticleScientific reports2025
Interindividual differences in auditory processing moderate the effect of auditory-motor coupling on paired-associate learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study explored the effects of auditory-motor coupling and individual differences in pitch perception on verbal learning. Participants (N = 47) learned a list of foreign-language vocabulary word pairs under isochronous or self-initiated auditory stimulation while cycling on a stationary bike. As expected, better movement consistency-i.e., lower cycling variability and more stable synchronization with the vocabulary presentation-was weakly associated with improved memory performance. Interestingly, we found inter-individual differences in the pattern of results: participants with fundamental pitch perception (FPP) benefited from isochronous stimulation immediately after learning (Day 1), but not after overnight consolidation (Day 2), whereas participants with spectral pitch perception (SPP) showed a long-term memory benefit from isochronous stimulation. This suggests that auditory processing characteristics modulate whether isochronous input supports early encoding or later consolidation. Furthermore, musically experienced participants showed more variable pedaling in the self-initiated condition, possibly reflecting deliberate modulation of input timing. In contrast, isochronous stimulation reduced variability across all participants, indicating implicit synchronization even without an explicit instruction to synchronize. Overall, these findings highlight the role of individual auditory and motor traits in shaping the cognitive benefits of sensorimotor coupling during learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.