ArticleScientific reports2025
The efficacy and safety analysis of D-TACE combined with donafenib and tislelizumab in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interventional Management of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: Are There Differences Between East and West?Current oncology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) combined with Donafenib and Tislelizumab versus D-TACE with Sorafenib in 105 patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection (January 2019-June 2023). Patients were divided into D-TACE + Donafenib + Tislelizumab (N = 51) and D-TACE + Sorafenib (N = 54) groups. The D-TACE + Donafenib + Tislelizumab group demonstrated significantly higher objective response rate (62.7% vs. 40.7%, P < 0.05) and disease control rate (84.3% vs. 64.8%, P < 0.05), along with prolonged median progression-free survival (8.7 vs. 5.7 months, P < 0.001) and overall survival (19.2 vs. 12.3 months, P < 0.001). While hypothyroidism incidence was higher in the D-TACE + Donafenib + Tislelizumab group (21.6% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.051), the D-TACE + Sorafenib group exhibited increased fatigue (35.2% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.006) and anorexia (35.2% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.013). These findings suggest that D-TACE combined with Donafenib and Tislelizumab offers superior tumor control and survival benefits with a manageable safety profile, representing a promising therapeutic strategy for postoperative recurrent HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.