ArticleScientific reports2025
Childhood visual impairment in Qassim region of Saudi Arabia prevalence causes and risk factors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Causes of Visual Impairment and Blindness in the Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Prevalence of visual impairment and associated risk factors: a cross-sectional community-based study among children and adolescents in Ghana.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the prevalence of childhood visual impairment and refractive errors, as well as the causes and risk factors associated with visual impairment among children in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia. This cross-sectional study included 850 children (aged 6-17 years) from six randomly selected primary schools in the Qassim region, conducted from March to May 2024. The study used the modified Refractive Error Study in Children (RESC) protocol. Refractive error was objectively assessed using a non-cycloplegic autorefractometer. Anterior eye examinations were performed using slit lamp biomicroscopy, while posterior segment examinations were conducted using a direct ophthalmoscope and 90 D fundus biomicroscopy. Visual impairment was classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 11th revision (ICD-11), 2018. The prevalence of presenting childhood visual impairment was 25.5%, reduced to 7.1% with best correction. Presenting visual impairment included mild impairment in 15.5% of participants, moderate in 6.4%, severe in 2.1%, and 1.5% were classified as blind. The leading cause of childhood visual impairment was uncorrected refractive error (67.3%), followed by amblyopia (23.0%); cataract (5.5%); and congenital disorders (5.1%). The prevalence of hyperopia, myopia, and astigmatism were 30.5%, 19.3%, and 11.3%, respectively. The regression analysis showed that males had lower odds of visual impairment compared to females (OR: 0.57; P = 0.001). Children who never had their eyes checked had lower odds of visual impairment compared to those who had regular eye examinations (OR: 0.32; P < 0.001). Additionally, emmetropic children had lower odds of visual impairment compared to those with uncorrected refractive errors (OR: 0.22; P < 0.001). This study found a high prevalence of childhood visual impairment and refractive errors, with uncorrected refractive errors being the leading cause. Regular eye examinations and corrective measures are essential. Males had lower odds of visual impairment compared to females. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to enhance eye care services and reduce visual impairment in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.