Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107393›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Atypical tool and object use in wild immature chimpanzees reveals developmental pathways to innovation.

Iulia Bădescu, Luseadra J McKerracher, Daniel W Sellen, David P Watts, Felix Riede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iulia BădescuDépartement d'Anthropologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. iulia.badescu@umontreal.ca.
Luseadra J McKerracherDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Daniel W SellenDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
David P WattsDepartment of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Felix RiedeDepartment of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, Aarhus University Moesgård, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovation drives cultural evolution, yet little is known about its developmental origins or the role of immature individuals in generating novel behaviors. We examined 67 object uses by 36 infant and juvenile chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii), over 15 months at Ngogo, Uganda. Nearly half of object uses were atypical, deviating from adult norms. 94% of atypical bouts were novel additions or modifications of adult forms or uses in new contexts, including three efficacious innovations: doll play, moss-sponging, and leaf-clipping to request carrying. To assess individual differences, we developed an Exploration Index integrating frequency, diversity, and atypicality of object use. Nine individuals had notably higher scores. Females and offspring of multiparous mothers scored higher, indicating effects of sex and possible social scaffolding from experienced mothers and siblings on object use. These findings suggest that immatures generate novelty at the margins of species-typical behavior yet vary in their propensity to innovate. A permissive social environment for object play may be key to the developmental pathways of innovation, providing a generative context for behavioral variation on which social learning and selection can act. If retained and transmitted, even rare innovations by immatures could contribute to the accumulation of cultural complexity.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalPan troglodytesTool Use BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMaleSocial BehaviorUgandaChimpanzeesCultural evolutionExploration and atypical behaviorInnovationObject playTool use development

Identifiers

PMID41107393
PMCPMC12534445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.