ArticleScientific reports2025
Green synthesis of magnetite (Fe
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dielectric polarization and charge transport in Gd-doped FeRSC advances · 2026Article
- Synthesis of a Novel Cone-like Tenorite-Antlerite Nanocomposite and Assessment of Its Photocatalytic and Antibacterial Activity.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Entropy optimization of magnetohydrodynamic Casson hybrid nanofluid flow over a rotating disk with Cattaneo Christov heat flux.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Manganese Ferrite/Guava Leaf Nano-Bio Composite for Adsorptive Removal of Methylene Blue Dye from Water.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Green and Stabilized Nanogold in Eucheuma Seaweed for Reactive Azo Catalysis.ChemistryOpen · 2026Article
- Article
- Eco-friendly synthesis of FeFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetite (Fe₃O₄) and hematite (Fe₂O₃) nanoparticles hold significant potential for catalysis, environmental remediation, biomedicine, and energy generation. However, conventional synthesis methods for iron-oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) are often complicated or involve hazardous reagents, limiting scalability. Although plant extract-mediated green synthesis offers better alternatives, many rely on rare or expensive biomaterials and hazardous precursors or pH-adjusting chemicals, compromising eco-friendliness and cost-effectiveness. To address these challenges, we developed a truly green, efficient, and economical protocol for synthesizing the nanoparticles smaller than 50 nm. Widely available Moringa oleifera (Moringa) and Psidium guajava (Guava) leaf extracts, along with a relatively low-cost, non-toxic FeSO₄·7 H₂O precursor at an optimized concentration, were employed without any harmful chemicals for pH adjustment. Additionally, a unique calcination strategy was applied. This method produced nanoparticles with an average size of 20-30 nm, confirmed by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM). Crystalline structures of the magnetite and hematite nanoparticles were validated by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and Fe-O bonding with organic capping was identified by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). These nanoparticles exhibited superparamagnetic behavior with saturation magnetization of 6-13 emu/g, measured by Vibrating Sample Magnetometry (VSM), and strong optical absorption with band gaps from 1.52 to 4.78 eV, determined by UV-Vis spectroscopy and Tauc's plots. Preliminary antibacterial and photocatalytic tests showed moderate bioactivity, highlighting potential environmental and biomedical uses. This eco-friendly, scalable approach combines abundant natural extracts and avoids the use of harmful chemicals, advancing sustainable production of magnetite and hematite nanoparticles and addressing a critical gap in green nanotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.