Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107380›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Factors associated with willingness to use ecological sanitation toilets in Katine sub county Soroti district Uganda: a cross sectional study.

Betty Osako Ikiring, David Okia, Charles Okolimong, Jimmy Patrick Alunyo, Richard Katuramu, Annet Tabitha Khainza, David Mukunya, Joseph K B Matovu, David Musoke, Peter Olupot-Olupot and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Betty Osako IkiringDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda. bettyosako55@gmail.com.
David OkiaDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Charles OkolimongDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Jimmy Patrick AlunyoDepartment of Research, Mbale Clinical Research Institute, Mbale, Uganda.
Richard KaturamuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Annet Tabitha KhainzaDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
David MukunyaDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Joseph K B MatovuDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
David MusokeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Peter Olupot-OlupotDepartment of Research, Mbale Clinical Research Institute, Mbale, Uganda.
Benon WanumeDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological sanitation (EcoSan) toilets provide a sustainable approach to waste management by converting human excreta into usable agricultural inputs. Despite their environmental and health benefits, uptake remains low in many settings. This study investigated the proportion of community members in Katine sub-county, Soroti district, Eastern Uganda, who had ever used EcoSan toilets, their willingness to use them, and the factors associated with this willingness. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 395 residents using structured questionnaires. Descriptive statistics estimated the proportions of prior use and willingness to use EcoSan toilets. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with willingness. Analyses were conducted in Stata 18, and results are presented in tables and figures. Only 18.5% (73/395) of respondents had used EcoSan toilets, and 13.7% (54/395) expressed willingness to use them. In multivariable analysis, key factors negatively associated with willingness included awareness of Ecosan toilets (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.16; p < 0.0001), willingness to use sanitized fecal matter (AOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.17; p < 0.0001), and perceived ease of use (AOR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.48; p = 0.001). Adoption of EcoSan toilets remains low in this setting, primarily due to limited awareness, cultural reservations, and usability concerns. Community sensitisation, culturally appropriate messaging, and user centered toilet design are essential to improving uptake in similar rural environments.

Indexed as

SanitationToilet FacilitiesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaYoung AdultEcological sanitationRural sanitationUgandaWaste reuseWillingness

Identifiers

PMID41107380
PMCPMC12534515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.