Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107358›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2026

Real-time and digital remote nutritional assessment framework with the use of smartphone-enabled facial morphometrics and machine learning- a proof of concept.

Wesley Li Wen Tay, Rina Yu Chin Quek, Joseph Lim, Bhupinder Kaur, Shalini Ponnalagu, Darel Wee Kiat Toh, Melvin Khee Shing Leow, Christiani Jeyakumar Henry

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wesley Li Wen Tay *Clinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 14 Medical Drive, MD6, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.
Rina Yu Chin Quek *Clinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 14 Medical Drive, MD6, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.
Joseph LimClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 14 Medical Drive, MD6, Singapore, 117599, Singapore. joseph_lim@a-star.edu.sg.
Bhupinder KaurClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 14 Medical Drive, MD6, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0428-2530
Shalini PonnalaguClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 14 Medical Drive, MD6, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.
Darel Wee Kiat TohClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 14 Medical Drive, MD6, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1608-0669
Melvin Khee Shing LeowClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 14 Medical Drive, MD6, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.
Christiani Jeyakumar HenryClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 14 Medical Drive, MD6, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent methods for assessing nutrition are often resource-intensive, requiring significant time, financial investment, and specialized equipment alongside clinical expertise.

objectiveThis research introduces an innovative approach that emphasizes accessible, scalable, and efficient digital solutions by leveraging facial morphometrics and machine learning to predict essential nutritional indicators.

methodsThe cross-sectional observational study involved 71 free-living Chinese adults (30 males, 41 females) aged 50-85. Utilizing widely accessible smartphone technology, 3D facial scans were employed to forecast nutritional metrics. The predictive performance of two machine-learning models, Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), was evaluated through ten-fold stratified cross-validation.

resultsThe RF model outperformed the XGB model, showing high predictive accuracy (median r² 0.51 to 0.92) for six parameters: muscle mass, basal metabolic rate (BMR), visceral fat index, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index, total body fat percentage, and hand grip strength. The highest predictive accuracy was found in muscle mass (r² = 0.92) and BMR (r² = 0.88) indicating strong correlations.

conclusionsThis non-invasive, economical technology presents a scalable approach to nutritional assessment with notable benefits for public health. The precise prediction of muscle mass and BMR facilitates efficient community-based screenings for undernutrition and frailty among older adults, while analysing body fat percentage aids in identifying overnutrition and related health risks. This digital approach shows significant potential for enhancing health outcomes on a population level through early detection and intervention.

Indexed as

FaceMachine LearningNutrition AssessmentSmartphoneAgedAged, 80 and overBasal MetabolismChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional Status

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.