ArticleScientific reports2025
New potential morphologic features of the aorta associated with the occurrence of acute type B aortic dissection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study aimed to identify aortic morphological features associated with the occurrence of acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD) and establish a risk prediction model. Patients in the control group were age- and sex-matched in a 1:1 ratio with the aTBAD group. Morphological parameters of the ascending aorta and aortic arch were measured on the GE Healthcare Advantage Workstation. The length and diameter of the ascending aorta and aortic arch in the aTBAD group increased significantly (all P < 0.001). The tortuosity and angulation of ascending aorta were significantly larger in the aTBAD group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.021, respectively), with no significant difference in the aortic arch (P = 0.757 and P = 0.212, respectively). The height and angle of the ascending aorta increased significantly in the aTBAD group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.039, respectively). The height, width, and angle of the aortic arch were significantly larger in the aTBAD group (all P < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression showed that distal left common carotid artery diameter, aortic arch height, and ascending aorta tortuosity were associated with the occurrence of aTBAD. The area under the curve of the risk prediction model and the validation dataset were 0.8415 and 0.8319, respectively. The width, height, and angle of the ascending aorta and aortic arch were associated with the occurrence of aTBAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.