ArticleScientific reports2025
Physicochemical profiling of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L.) reveals variation in cooking quality relevant to breeding programs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding seed physicochemical properties allows breeders to select traits that contribute to desirable cooking characteristics (texture, taste, and nutritional content). Breeding programs can optimize resources by focusing on traits directly related to cooking time and quality. A total of 156 Bambara groundnut (BGN) recombinant inbred lines were analysed for physicochemical properties [hydration capacity (HC), hydration index (HI), swelling index (SI), pH, texture and cooking time (CT)], proximate and nutrient compositions. Analysis of variance showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in variables measured. Shortest CT (40 min) was recorded in S19/Ankpa4-100-87, while S19/Ankpa4-106-92 has the longest CT (147 min). Cooking time was negatively correlated with HC (r = - 0.42), HI (r = - 0.45) and swelling capacity (SC) (r = - 0.55). Neutral Detergent Fibre (NDF) and protein content showed significant differences between raw and cooked BGN (p < 0.05). Cooking significantly increased protein, fat, NDF, Zn, and Cu; however, cooking also significantly reduced Fe and total mineral (ash). Texture, CT and electrical conductivity (EC) of the genotypes varied significantly, which aided classification into five groups, namely: A (soft-cooking genotypes), B (slightly soft-cooking genotypes), C (slightly hard-cooking genotypes), D (moderately hard-cooking genotypes) and E (hard-cooking genotypes). A total of 14 genotypes (DodR, BURKINA, ANKPA 4, TIGD, NAV 4, S19/Ankpa4-100-87 IITA686/LunT-292-233, IITA686/LunT, S19/Ankpa4-130-1, S19/Ankpa4-50-43, S19/Ankpa4-92, IITA686/LunT-403-314, S19/Ankpa4-141-121 and S19/Ankpa4-234-197) were grouped as soft-cooking. These soft-cooking genotypes could be available as genetic stock to confirm this attribute or reanalysis by breeders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.