Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107310›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A reevaluation of the visual phantom illusion and its impact on the motion aftereffect.

Loïc Daumail, Randolph Blake, Frank Tong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Loïc DaumailDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. loic.daumail@gmail.com.
Randolph BlakeDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Frank TongDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. frank.tong@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Kevin L Schey · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
Learning the visual and cognitive bases of lung nodule detectionR01CA240274 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FRANK TONG · 2021 to 2026
$1.8M
Neural and computational mechanisms underlying robust object recognitionR01EY035157 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FRANK TONG · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
Perceptual functions of the human lateral geniculate nucleusR01EY029278 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI TONG, FRANK · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
National Science Foundation 2241975NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240274NCI NIH HHS R01CA240274NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008126NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029278NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035157NEI NIH HHS R01EY035157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The constructive nature of motion perception has been highlighted in studies of the visual phantom illusion. Visual phantoms can occur when two low-contrast collinear drifting gratings are separated by a blank gap, leading to the ghostly impression of drifting stripes that extend through the gap. Although previous work has shown that phantom-inducing gratings can elicit a motion aftereffect (MAE) in the gap region, it is not known whether these MAEs arise from the perception of visual phantoms per se. Here, we evaluated the strength of MAEs elicited by phantom-inducing gratings and well-matched control stimuli. Either the darkest portion of the inducer gratings matched the background luminance to elicit more vivid phantoms or the mean luminance of the inducers matched the background as a control. Both phantom and control inducers predominantly evoked impressions of opposite-direction motion, but the dynamic MAE proved somewhat stronger for phantom than control inducers. Also, MAEs were more strongly modulated by the physical contrast of the control inducers and less influenced by the contrast of the phantom inducers. These findings suggest that low-level motion adaptation strongly contributes to the MAEs elicited in the gap region but that the magnitude of adaptation is further modulated by phantom perception.

Indexed as

Figural AftereffectIllusionsMotion PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultMotion aftereffectMotion perceptionPerceptual filling-inVisual phantom illusion

Identifiers

PMID41107310
PMCPMC12534567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.