ArticleScientific reports2025
Experimental study on mechanical performance and microstructural characterization of optimized sisal fiber reinforced polyester composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extraction of natural fibres from Agave fourcroydes leaves and multi-property evaluation for potential textile applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quantitative assessment of alkali and carbon nanotube reinforcement effects on the tensile reliability of sustainable sisal fiber bio-based epoxy composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Potential of jute seeds crop waste for textile applications: a novel machine-based approach for sustainable resource utilization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the mechanical, dynamic, and thermal behavior of sisal fiber-reinforced polyester composites. Specimens were fabricated using manual hand layup with randomly distributed 20 mm sisal fibers at weight fractions of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. Mechanical tests (tensile, flexural, impact, double shear, and compressive), free vibration analysis, damping evaluation, thermal characterization, and SEM imaging were performed. Results show that increasing fiber content enhanced most mechanical properties, natural frequency, and storage modulus, although peak damping values (tan δ) decreased with higher fiber loading. The highest impact strength (16 J) and compressive strength (52.4 MPa) were obtained at 20% fiber, while the most balanced overall performance was achieved at 15%, yielding maximum tensile strength of 17.44 MPa, flexural strength of 52.65 MPa, and shear strength of 77.97 MPa. Free vibration tests recorded a frequency of 67.38 Hz with a damping ratio of 0.059, and dynamic mechanical analysis reported a storage modulus up to 7.5 GPa. Thermal stability was maintained up to 300 °C, with rapid degradation above 400 °C and heat flux peaks at 600 °C. SEM analysis confirmed that fiber distribution and orientation strongly influenced composite performance. Overall, 15% sisal fiber content was identified as optimal for structural applications requiring balanced strength, dynamic behavior, and thermal stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.