ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative evaluation of amiodarone and furosemide compatibility under different mixing conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amiodarone and furosemide are frequently administered together in the intensive care unit, and their co-administration poses a risk of precipitation and catheter occlusion due to incompatibility. Thus, compatibility should be evaluated under clinically relevant conditions to ensure safe drug administration. This study investigated the impact of different mixing procedures on the physical compatibility of amiodarone and furosemide by employing two clinically relevant approaches: simulated mixing (SM) and route mixing (RM). Mixtures were prepared at therapeutic concentrations and evaluated by visual inspection, absorbance measurement, powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), pH analysis, and particle size assessment. Although the drug ratios were identical, the RM samples displayed greater turbidity than the SM samples. The PXRD analysis showed no formation of new crystalline substances, and the precipitates consisted of known furosemide and amiodarone hydrochloride polymorphs. The pH shifted toward the alkaline range as the injection volume increased with furosemide dose. Importantly, differences in particle growth behavior were noted between SM and RM, with larger particles observed in the RM samples. In conclusion, mixing route significantly affects drug compatibility, with RM presenting a higher risk of precipitation. Assessing drug compatibility under clinically relevant conditions may help prevent catheter-related complications and improve the safety of intravenous pharmacotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.