ArticleNature communications2025
Explicit error coding can mediate gain recalibration in continuous bump attractor networks.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous path-integration recalibration in head direction and place cells.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Synchronized path-integration recalibration but distinct landmark-control dynamics in head direction and CA1 place cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Allothetic and idiothetic spatial cues control the multiplexed theta phase coding of place cells.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous bump attractor networks (CBANs) are a prevailing model for how neural circuits represent continuous variables. CBANs maintain these representations by temporally integrating inputs that encode differential (i.e., incremental) changes to a given variable. The accuracy of this computation hinges on a precisely tuned integration gain. Experiments have shown that the brain can recalibrate this gain using ground-truth sensory information, yet existing CBAN models rely on biologically implausible or currently unknown plasticity rules for recalibration. Here, we demonstrate that ring-type CBANs can recalibrate their integration gain through two mechanisms that rely on well-established, biologically plausible forms of plasticity. In the first mechanism, the spatially distributed synapses conveying incremental information to the attractor are plastic, allowing the integration gain to become transiently inhomogeneous during recalibration. In the second, plasticity is implemented in other components of the network, keeping the gain homogeneous during recalibration. Both mechanisms require explicit error signals that drive plasticity. We instantiate each mechanism within a CBAN, demonstrating their potential for biologically plausible, adaptive coding of continuous variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.