Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107247›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Explicit error coding can mediate gain recalibration in continuous bump attractor networks.

Gorkem Secer, James J Knierim, Noah J Cowan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gorkem SecerLaboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. gsecer1@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6612-7782
James J KnierimZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1796-2930
Noah J CowanLaboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. ncowan@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2502-3770

Funding

Cross-Modal Sensory Interactions, Processing, and Representation in the Drosophila BrainU01NS131438 · NINDS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, ITAI, COWAN, NOAH JOHN · 2023 to 2025
$5.8M
A Control Theoretic Approach to Addressing Hippocampal FunctionR01NS102537 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Noah John Cowan, JAMES J KNIERIM · 2017 to 2026
$3.6M
CRCNS: Dynamics of Gain Recalibration in the Hippocampal-Entorhinal Path Integration SystemR01MH118926 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COWAN, NOAH JOHN, HEDRICK, KATHRYN · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Kavli Foundation Distinguished Postdoctoral FellowshipNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118926NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102537NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS131438U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01-MH118926U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R01-NS102537U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) U01-NS131438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous bump attractor networks (CBANs) are a prevailing model for how neural circuits represent continuous variables. CBANs maintain these representations by temporally integrating inputs that encode differential (i.e., incremental) changes to a given variable. The accuracy of this computation hinges on a precisely tuned integration gain. Experiments have shown that the brain can recalibrate this gain using ground-truth sensory information, yet existing CBAN models rely on biologically implausible or currently unknown plasticity rules for recalibration. Here, we demonstrate that ring-type CBANs can recalibrate their integration gain through two mechanisms that rely on well-established, biologically plausible forms of plasticity. In the first mechanism, the spatially distributed synapses conveying incremental information to the attractor are plastic, allowing the integration gain to become transiently inhomogeneous during recalibration. In the second, plasticity is implemented in other components of the network, keeping the gain homogeneous during recalibration. Both mechanisms require explicit error signals that drive plasticity. We instantiate each mechanism within a CBAN, demonstrating their potential for biologically plausible, adaptive coding of continuous variables.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNerve NetAlgorithmsAnimalsBrainCalibrationNeurofeedbackNeuronal PlasticityNeurons

Identifiers

PMID41107247
PMCPMC12534468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.