Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107242›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Weather drivers of reproductive variability in perennial plants and their implications for climate change risks.

Valentin Journé, Dave Kelly, Andrew Hacket-Pain, Ian S Pearse, Jakub Szymkowiak, Jessie J Foest, Katarzyna Kondrat, Iris Oberklammer, Mario B Pesendorfer, Akiko Satake and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. European beech reproduction is not reduced by drought, including the 2003, 2018, and 2022 extremes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Valentin JournéForest Biology Center, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland. journe.valentin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7324-7002
Dave KellyCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Andrew Hacket-PainDepartment of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3676-1568
Ian S PearseU.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Jakub SzymkowiakForest Biology Center, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-1876
Jessie J FoestForest Biology Center, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8236-4646
Katarzyna KondratForest Biology Center, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Iris OberklammerInstitute of Forest Ecology, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6518-271X
Mario B PesendorferInstitute of Forest Ecology, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-7090
Akiko SatakeDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Michał BogdziewiczForest Biology Center, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland. michalbogdziewicz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6777-9034

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101039066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seed production in perennial plants often shows strong year-to-year variation, a phenomenon known as masting. Masting is typically adaptive and driven by weather cues that synchronize reproduction by promoting or suppressing flowering and seed set. These cues, involving temperature, precipitation, and drought, differ across species and regions, yet a global synthesis is needed. Understanding such patterns is crucial, as reproductive responses to climate interact with resource constraints to shape plant fitness under climate change. Here, we analyze climate-reproduction relationships in 746 populations of 331 species worldwide using moving-window methods. We find that temperature is the dominant cue for reproductive investment, though its influence is weaker in the wettest and driest climates. In temperate and boreal regions, reproduction is most often linked to warmer conditions, whereas in the tropics, reproduction is disproportionately linked to cooler temperatures. Therefore, we expect rising temperatures to increase reproductive failures in the tropics, but to reduce interannual variability in temperate and boreal zones as favorable cues become more frequent. These results confirm long-standing theoretical predictions and provide a global framework for evaluating climate change risks to mast seeding.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeWeatherDroughtsReproductionSeedsTemperature

Identifiers

PMID41107242
PMCPMC12534544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.