Observational studyJournal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia2026
Predicting In-Hospital Acute Kidney Injury after Cardiac Surgery Using Machine Learning.
Observational study in Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning for the prediction of acute kidney injury post cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning-based prediction of postoperative continuous renal replacement therapy initiation after open thoracoabdominal aortic repair.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Association between Creatinine Trajectories and All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Patients after Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on MIMIC-IV.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2026Article
- Performance of Cleveland, Mehta, and Simplified Renal Index scores for predicting dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury after aorticRenal failure · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to develop and evaluate cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) machine learning prediction models that included clinical variables, biomarkers, and high-frequency hemodynamic measurements.
designA prospective, observational study.
settingA single-center university hospital.
participantsSix hundred sixty-seven adult patients undergoing elective and urgent cardiac surgery between May 2015 and March 2023. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsAfter excluding patients for clinical and administrative reasons and those with missing data, 602 patients were included in the predictive models. Random forest (RF) and long short-term memory (LSTM) models were trained on data from 492 patients, which included hemodynamic data from throughout the perioperative period, and BNP and [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] biomarkers. These models were evaluated in a test set of 110 patients to predict CSA-AKI, which was defined as a serum creatinine rise of 0.3 mg/dL in the first 48 hours after surgery or 1.5 times baseline creatinine between postoperative day 1 to day 7. The RF model achieved an AUC of 0.73 (0.72-0.74) and accuracy of 0.77 (0.76-0.79) on the test set. The RF model achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 0.59 (0.57-0.62) and 0.81 (0.79-0.84), respectively. The LSTM model achieved an AUC of 0.68 (0.67-0.70) and accuracy of 0.72 (0.69-0.74) on the test set. The sensitivity of the LSTM model was 0.60 (0.57-0.64), and the specificity was 0.74 (0.71-0.78).
conclusionsWe developed two machine learning models that incorporated perioperative biomarkers and hemodynamics as input data to predict CSA-AKI. The models exhibited competitive performance for prediction of the outcome and laid the foundation for further advancement in this critical area of research in kidney injury prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.