Trial reportBrachytherapy
Image guided brachytherapy quality assurance on NRG GY017 investigating immunotherapy in addition to chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Trial report in Brachytherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiation Quality and Workflow in NRG GY017: Anti-PD-L1 (Atezolizumab) as an Immune Primer or Concurrently With Radiation Therapy for Node-Positive Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Trial
- Dosimetric comparison of MRI-guided and CT-guided intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBrachytherapy is a critical component of curative treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer. NRG GY-017 is a randomized Phase I trial of the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab administered neoadjuvantly and concurrently with chemoradiation (Arm A) or only concurrently with chemoradiation (Arm B) in patients with node positive locally advanced cervical cancer. Image guided brachytherapy (IGBT) was mandated in the protocol with a quality assurance (QA) workflow. Herein, we report the BT quality data on NRG GY-017 trial and practice patterns from the participating centers in this trial as a guide for future protocol brachytherapy QA.
methodsThe participating sites were to submit brachytherapy plans online after BT was completed. IROC QA center compiled the BT fractions for each patient using the trial specific dosimetry evaluation template. An expert physician reviewer scored the contours and plans as per protocol, variation acceptable or major deviation as prespecified in the protocol dose metrics.
resultsThe BT dosimetry results were available for 32 patients. Seventeen patients (53%) had intracavitary applicator, and 15 patients (47%) had hybrid or interstitial applicators. Point A directed planning was performed for 4 patients (12.5%) and 28 patients had volume directed plans (87.5%). For imaging use, 2 patients had MRI based plans, and 30 had CT based planning (94%). For the dose constraints compliance per protocol, 7 patients had 9 events scored as major deviations (22%).
conclusionBT trial specific QA has the potential to enhance BT quality for clinical trials. This report will help guide future gynecologic BT trial data collection and QA process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.