ArticleRMD open2025
Utility of repeat MRI in assessing treatment non-response in axial spondyloarthritis: data from two large tertiary rheumatology centres.
Article in RMD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Utility of Repeat Sacroiliac Joint MRI in Patients Evaluated for Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Real-World Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Better communication between rheumatologists and radiologists is key to improving MRI requesting and reporting data in axial spondyloarthritis: audit data from a single specialist centre.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe role of MRI of the spine/sacroiliac joints to aid the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is well established. Limited data, however, exist on the use of MRI to assess disease activity, resulting in current Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) guidelines not recommending the use of MRI for this purpose. We aimed to assess the current use of MRI to assess disease activity and its impact on clinical decision making.
methodsAs part of a service evaluation, we identified patients with a prior diagnosis of axSpA, who had an MRI of the spine/sacroiliac joints requested between May 2020 and December 2023 at The Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust (Leeds) and Northwick Park Hospital (London). Clinical and demographic data were extracted from the medical notes. Data on MRI findings were extracted from the radiologist's report.
resultsOverall, 346 scans were performed in 335 patients. 301 patients had axSpA (170 radiographic axSpA, 131 non-radiographic axSpA) and 31 axial psoriatic arthritis. Patients were predominantly male (60.0%) and HLA-B27 positive (60.6%). 140/172 (80.1%) of patients had evidence of inflammation on a pre-treatment MRI scan. 224 scans (64.7%) were performed in patients on biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Of the 346 MRIs performed during the audit period, 179 (54.7%) had evidence of active inflammation and those with active inflammation were more likely to have their treatment escalated (59.3% vs 23.2%).
conclusionsMRI is of utility in assessing disease activity with results of MRI scans directly influencing treatment decision making at the bedside. Further research exploring the relationship between MRI findings and clinical outcomes is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.